State v. McKnight

576 S.E.2d 168 (2003)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. McKnight

South Carolina Supreme Court
576 S.E.2d 168 (2003)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

Regina McKnight (defendant) gave birth to a stillborn baby due to cocaine use during pregnancy. The State of South Carolina (plaintiff) prosecuted McKnight for homicide by child abuse. At trial, the doctor who performed the autopsy testified that he ruled the death a homicide and the delivery nurse testified that McKnight gave consent to drug test her urine, which tested positive for cocaine. McKnight moved for a directed verdict, arguing that there was insufficient evidence as to the cause of death, the required criminal intent, and whether the baby was viable when the cocaine was ingested. The trial court denied the motion. McKnight moved to dismiss the charge, arguing that it was never the legislature’s intent to apply the homicide-by-child-abuse statute to fetuses. The trial court refused to dismiss the charge. McKnight moved to suppress the urine sample, arguing that it constituted a violation to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The trial court refused to suppress the evidence. The first trial resulted in a mistrial. McKnight was found guilty at the second trial and received a 20-year sentence, suspended for 12 years. McKnight appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Waller, J.)

Dissent (Moore, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership