Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

State v. Mendoza

Rhode Island Supreme Court
889 A.2d 153 (2005)


Facts

Undercover detectives Angelo A’Vant and Fabio Zuena were patrolling a Providence neighborhood in an unmarked car when Robert Clement approached and asked whether the detectives were looking to buy crack cocaine. Clement led Detective A’Vant to a nearby house while Detective Zuena waited in the car. Detective A’Vant handed Clement $20 in prerecorded buy money to purchase the drugs. Clement rang a doorbell, and Antonio Mendoza (defendant) answered the door. Mendoza and Clement went inside the house and reemerged a few moments later. Detective A’Vant saw Mendoza hand Clement a clear baggie containing crack cocaine. Back at the car, Clement was immediately arrested after handing Detective A’Vant the baggie of drugs. Mendoza was arrested a short time later. A jury convicted Mendoza of conspiracy to violate the Rhode Island Controlled Substances Act. Mendoza moved for acquittal, arguing that there could be no conspiracy because the underlying offense—the sale and delivery of drugs—presupposed as an element of the crime that both parties agreed to the sale and delivery (this is known as Wharton’s Rule). Thus, Mendoza argued, the conspiracy as charged was a legal impossibility. The trial judge denied Mendoza’s motion. Mendoza appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Williams, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.