State v. MLC
Utah Supreme Court
933 P.2d 380 (1997)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
MLC (defendant), a 16-year-old, was charged with armed robbery in juvenile court. The juvenile-court proceeding was a civil proceeding that was initiated with a petition of criminal information. By statute, the armed-robbery charge made MLC a serious youth offender and required the juvenile court to consider whether to transfer him to adult criminal court at a determination hearing. MLC asked the juvenile court to set bail so that he could be free while awaiting the determination hearing. The juvenile court denied MLC’s request for bail, and MLC was detained until the determination hearing. At the hearing, the juvenile court determined that MLC should be transferred to criminal court and tried as an adult. The juvenile court then set MLC’s bail. MLC appealed the juvenile court’s earlier ruling denying him bail while he waited for the determination hearing. MLC argued that denying him bail while he was in the juvenile court’s custody violated his Eighth Amendment and Equal Protection rights under the United States Constitution, as well as his rights under Utah’s state constitution. By the time MLC’s appeal was ready to be heard, his criminal-court bail had been set, making his personal claim moot. However, because the issue of bail was likely to come up in other cases, the Utah Supreme Court agreed to review the issue to provide guidance for future situations.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Russon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

