Supreme Court of North Carolina
340 S.E.2d 84 (1986)
The State of North Carolina (plaintiff) prosecuted Bradley Morgan (defendant) for murdering Austin Harrell. At trial, Morgan testified he acted in self-defense when Harrell threatened his life. On recross examination, the prosecutor questioned Morgan about two recent prior incidents in which Morgan allegedly pointed a gun at other people. Morgan was not charged with assault for either incident, and the prosecutor introduced no other evidence relating to the incidents. The jury convicted Morgan for Harrell's murder. On appeal to the Supreme Court of North Carolina, Morgan argued the trial judge erred in admitting evidence of the prior assaults.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Meyer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.