Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

State v. Morris

Supreme Court of Iowa
677 N.W.2d 787 (2004)


Facts

In the early hours of the morning, William Morris (defendant) came across a running vehicle on the driveway of its owner, Brian Gonzales. Gonzalez had left the running vehicle on his drive to warm up and reentered his home. Morris drove away in the vehicle without Gonzales’s consent and was subsequently tracked by local police. Once located by law enforcement, Morris abandoned the vehicle and ran away on foot. Shortly afterward, police located and arrested Morris. Morris was convicted of second-degree theft as a habitual offender under Iowa Code § 714.2(2), § 902.8 and § 902.9(3). The lesser-included offense of operating a motor vehicle without the owner’s consent was also before the jury, but the jury determined Morris’s conduct met the requirements for the higher offense of theft. Morris appealed the conviction on the ground that the intent element for theft of a motor vehicle was not satisfied. Morris alleged there was no evidence to support that he intended to permanently deprive Gonzales of the vehicle. The court of appeals agreed with Morris and reversed the theft conviction. The state appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence (Carter, J.)

The concurrence section is for members only and includes a summary of the concurring judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Larson, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.