State v. Mosby
Louisiana Court of Appeal
581 So. 2d 1060 (1991)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
On March 9, 1987, Guy McFarland observed James Mosby (defendant), a young Black man, outside a bank in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. McFarland made eye contact with Mosby, and Mosby quickly looked the other way and walked away. McFarland entered the bank lobby and was standing in line to make a deposit when Mosby came up behind him, grabbed a bank-deposit bag of money from McFarland, and fled the bank. McFarland described Mosby to bank officials and the police. A few weeks later, a police detective showed McFarland a photographic lineup that included pictures of six Black males, including a man named Michael Jackson. McFarland did not make an identification from the lineup. After Mosby’s ex-girlfriend informed the police that Mosby had robbed a bank, the detective prepared another photographic lineup that included pictures of six Black males, this time including Mosby. McFarland identified Mosby from that lineup, and Mosby was arrested and charged with the robbery. At Mosby’s trial, Mosby’s defense theory was that someone else robbed McFarland and that McFarland had mistakenly identified Mosby. Mosby attempted to introduce evidence that Jackson, who was of a similar age and build as Mosby, had been arrested and charged with committing two similar robberies in January and April of 1987 at banks near the one at which McFarland was robbed. The trial court refused to admit the evidence. The jury convicted Mosby, and he appealed to the Louisiana Court of Appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lanier, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.