Hawaii Supreme Court
659 P.2d 745 (1983)
Shortly after Wendy Iwashita was robbed at gunpoint while working as a cashier at a coffee house, she gave a description of the robber to police who arrived on the scene. One week later, Iwashita gave a description of the robber to Joe Aragon, a police artist, who drew a composite sketch based on her description. About one month later, Iwashita identified Motta (defendant) in an array of twenty-five to thirty photographs and about a week later identified Motta as the robber at a preliminary hearing. Iwashita again identified Motta when she testified at trial. Joe Aragon also testified at trial. Motta presented an alibi defense at trial, claiming that he was at a nightclub and presented the testimony of several witnesses who described his appearance on the night of the robbery and corroborated his alibi. The jury found Motta guilty and Motta appealed. On appeal to the Hawaii Supreme Court, Motta claimed that the trial court erred in admitting the composite sketch because it was inadmissible hearsay. Motta also asserted that the sketch was inadmissible corroborating evidence because Iwashita had not been impeached and therefore the State did not have the right to offer corroborating evidence on rebuttal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lum, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.