Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

State v. Motta

Hawaii Supreme Court
659 P.2d 745 (1983)


Facts

Shortly after Wendy Iwashita was robbed at gunpoint while working as a cashier at a coffee house, she gave a description of the robber to police who arrived on the scene. One week later, Iwashita gave a description of the robber to Joe Aragon, a police artist, who drew a composite sketch based on her description. About one month later, Iwashita identified Motta (defendant) in an array of twenty-five to thirty photographs and about a week later identified Motta as the robber at a preliminary hearing. Iwashita again identified Motta when she testified at trial. Joe Aragon also testified at trial. Motta presented an alibi defense at trial, claiming that he was at a nightclub and presented the testimony of several witnesses who described his appearance on the night of the robbery and corroborated his alibi. The jury found Motta guilty and Motta appealed. On appeal to the Hawaii Supreme Court, Motta claimed that the trial court erred in admitting the composite sketch because it was inadmissible hearsay. Motta also asserted that the sketch was inadmissible corroborating evidence because Iwashita had not been  impeached and therefore the State did not have the right to offer corroborating evidence on rebuttal.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Lum, C.J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 170,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.