State v. Nolan

2013-Ohio-2829 (2013)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Nolan

Ohio Court of Appeals
2013-Ohio-2829 (2013)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Travis McPeak and Bobby Nolan (defendant) got into an altercation. McPeak decided to leave. As McPeak approached the sidewalk, he saw a shadow behind him. Nolan attempted to hit McPeak, but McPeak dodged the blow and pushed Nolan to the ground. As Nolan was getting up, he removed a gun from his pocket and fired it in McPeak’s general direction. The bullet entered McPeak’s outer thigh and exited his inner thigh. McPeak survived the shooting. Nolan was charged with two counts of attempted murder and one count of felonious assault. The first count of attempted murder charged Nolan with purposely attempting to cause McPeak’s death, and the second alleged that Nolan knowingly engaged in conduct that, if successful, would have caused McPeak’s death as a proximate result of Nolan’s commission of felonious assault. Nolan was acquitted on the first attempted-murder count and convicted on the remaining counts. On appeal, after the court requested supplemental briefing on whether attempted felony murder is a viable criminal offense, Nolan argued that he could not be convicted of attempted felony murder because the victim did not die.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership