Supreme Court of Washington
882 P.2d 183 (1994)
Herbert Pacheco (defendant) boasted to Thomas Dillon, his coworker, about his involvement in criminal activities, including performing hits. Dillon learned that Pacheco was a deputy sheriff and contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), volunteering to inform on Pacheco. Law enforcement devised a plan in which Dillon called Pacheco and asked to meet to discuss a deal. Pursuant to the plan, Dillon offered to pay Pacheco to offer protection during a drug deal. Pacheco agreed. Later, Dillon told Pacheco that he had been cheated out of money during the deal and asked Pacheco to handle the situation. Pacheco offered to kill the buyer. Pacheco was to call the buyer down to a motel lobby and shoot him. Pacheco went to the lobby with a loaded gun but did not call the buyer down. As Pacheco left the motel, he was arrested. Pacheco was charged with conspiracy to commit murder, attempted murder, and two counts of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. Under Washington’s conspiracy statute, a person is guilty of conspiracy when: (1) with the intent that conduct constituting a crime be performed, the person agrees with one or more persons to engage in the conduct, and (2) any one of the persons takes a substantial step in furtherance of the agreement. The jury acquitted Pacheco of attempted murder but convicted Pacheco on all other counts. Pacheco appealed, arguing that he had not committed conspiracy, as no genuine bilateral agreement existed between Pacheco and Dillon as required by the conspiracy statute.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)
Dissent (Durham, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.