State v. Peterson

634 S.E.2d 594 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Peterson

North Carolina Court of Appeals
634 S.E.2d 594 (2006)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Michael Peterson (defendant) was charged with murdering his wife, Kathleen. Peterson called 911 at 2:40 a.m. saying Kathleen had fallen down the stairs. Paramedics found Kathleen dead at the bottom of the staircase. Peterson was standing over her with blood splattered on his shirt. The paramedics reported unusual amounts of blood for a fall. Peterson said he went outside briefly and found Kathleen when he returned. The investigation revealed Peterson’s computer contained homosexual pornography and emails with a male escort arranging for paid sexual services. Printouts of the emails and photographs of the escort were found in Peterson’s study along with a tax appraisal of their home and a flex-benefit statement from Kathleen’s employer. Records revealed recent financial difficulties. Kathleen earned about $150,000 annually and had started cashing in stock options but was slated for layoffs and stood to lose a $1.5 million life insurance policy that designated Peterson as beneficiary on an unsigned form. Peterson stood to gain about $347,000 from Kathleen’s other work-related benefits, plus half an estate worth about $1.6 million. A neighbor of Peterson’s, Elizabeth Ratliff, died 17 years earlier under similar circumstances. Peterson was the last person to see her alive before she was found dead at the bottom of a stairwell, the scene splattered with unusual amounts of blood. Her death had been ruled accidental, but her body was exhumed after Kathleen’s death, and the examiner found blunt trauma wounds identical to Kathleen’s consistent with homicide. Before trial, the defense moved to exclude the evidence of finances, bisexuality, and Ratliff’s death, but the trial court admitted the challenged evidence. In opening statements, the defense portrayed the Petersons as a happy couple. Experts testified an accidental fall could have caused Kathleen’s injuries, despite the examiner determining her death was a homicide. Peterson was convicted and appealed on multiple grounds, including the evidentiary rulings.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Elmore, J.)

Dissent (Wynn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership