State v. Pickett
New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
246 A.3d 279 (2021)
- Written by Haley Gintis, JD
Facts
In 2017 the state of New Jersey (plaintiff) charged Corey Pickett (defendant) with murder. The state sought to introduce forensic evidence that Pickett’s DNA matched the DNA found on two revolvers and a ski mask recovered near the crime scene. The DNA match was obtained by a private company that had developed a software program to identify DNA profiles from smaller samples or from samples that included multiple DNA profiles. Because the method of DNA profiling used, called probabilistic genotyping, had not been previously deemed as reliable, the state requested a Frye hearing. The trial court granted the request. An expert testified that the software program had been correctly coded to obtain reliable DNA profiles. In response, Pickett filed a motion requesting the software’s source code and all records regarding the software’s glitches, errors, and unexpected results. Pickett sought the information to form an argument challenging the software’s reliability, particularly because issues had been raised concerning a similar program’s source code. The trial court denied the motion on the ground that the information Pickett requested constituted trade secrets. The decision was appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fasciale, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.