Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

State v. Pollard

862 N.W.2d 414 (2015)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...

State v. Pollard

Iowa Court of Appeals

862 N.W.2d 414 (2015)

Facts

Bruce Pollard (defendant) walked into Cinema X with a crowbar. Pollard struck the theater manager, McDaniel, in the head and strangled him with the crowbar. McDaniel was much older than Pollard and unarmed. Eventually, Pollard admitted to killing McDaniel. However, Pollard claimed that he killed McDaniel in self-defense. According to Pollard, McDaniel sat very close to Pollard during a movie and made a sexual advance. Pollard said that he told McDaniel that the interaction was inappropriate and that then he felt something on his leg and panicked. Pollard alleged that he ran to the front door, which was locked, and that McDaniel was behind him when he turned around. At this point, Pollard admits to hitting McDaniel with the crowbar and strangling him. At trial, Pollard sought to use an affirmative defense of justification. The trial court instructed the jury on Pollard’s justification defense, which defined the use of reasonable force. Pollard’s counsel did not request an additional jury instruction explaining the exception to the alternative-course-of-action requirement for his justification defense. The given instruction and Pollard’s desired instruction were substantially similar in that both instructions essentially provided that a killing is justified if the killer reasonably believed that force was necessary to avoid injury. The jury convicted Pollard of first-degree murder. Pollard appealed, arguing that his counsel was ineffective for failing to request the additional instruction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Tabor, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 35,400 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership