State v. Popanz

332 N.W.2d 750 (1983)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Popanz

Wisconsin Supreme Court
332 N.W.2d 750 (1983)

EL

Facts

The state of Wisconsin prosecuted Laurence Popanz (defendant) in state court for violating state compulsory-education statutes requiring the regular attendance of Wisconsin children in public or private schools. In the statute, there was no definition of what constituted private schooling. In the absence of a statutory definition of private school, school attendance officers and school administrators were solely responsible for deciding what sorts of alternative school attendance qualified as private schooling under the statute. Popanz claimed the compulsory-education statute was void for vagueness because the statute contained no definition of private school. The lower state court convicted Popanz of violating the compulsory-attendance statute. Popanz appealed to the state court of appeals, which affirmed the lower court’s conviction. Popanz appealed his conviction again to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Abrahamson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership