State v. Porter

241 Or. App. 26, 249 P.3d 139 (2011)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Porter

Oregon Court of Appeals
241 Or. App. 26, 249 P.3d 139 (2011)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Norman Porter (defendant) rented a home in Oregon. Porter’s wife, Leblanc-Porter, and two other unrelated friends, Davies and Clements, lived with Porter in the Oregon house but were not on the lease and did not pay rent. The household members engaged in frequent sexual activities with each other. Subsequently, Leblanc-Porter brought her 15-year-old daughter from a prior marriage, D, to come live in Porter’s house. Leblanc-Porter and Davies sexually abused D. On multiple occasions, D was abused in the public areas of the house while Porter witnessed, and took pleasure from, the abuse. Porter never directly participated in abusing D but did not do anything to stop Leblanc-Porter or Davies from abusing D in Porter’s home. The State of Oregon (plaintiff) charged Porter for permitting a minor, D, to participate in a live display of sexually explicit conduct, a Class A felony. Porter filed a motion for judgment of acquittal, arguing that he could not have permitted D to engage in a live display of sexually explicit conduct because he had no legal authority over D. The trial court dismissed Porter’s motion and convicted him. Porter appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brewer, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership