State v. Quality Egg Farm, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
104 Wis. 2d 506, 311 N.W.2d 650 (1981)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
The Quality Egg Farm, Inc. (Egg Farm) (defendant) began its egg-farm operations in 1967. Over the course of a decade, the operations more than doubled. As a result, several tons of chicken manure accumulated on the property, which caused intense odors to be present on neighboring properties, as well as a significant issue with flies to occur. Thus, the State of Wisconsin (state) (plaintiff) filed an action for abatement of a public nuisance against Egg Farm, seeking abatement of the emission of chicken and chicken manure odors caused by Egg Farm’s operations. At trial, residents who lived within five miles of Egg Farm and who resided in the area prior to the start of its operations testified that the chicken manure odors were nauseating and unbearable. The trial court ultimately entered an injunction in favor of the state and gave Egg Farm nine months to eliminate all objectionable odors and the fly problem. The court based this injunction on the finding that Egg Farm constituted a public nuisance. Egg Farm appealed, and the court of appeals reversed the trial court, finding that the evidence presented was insufficient because only a few private parties were affected, but private relief was not being sought by the state. The state then sought review of the court of appeals’ decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Steinmetz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.