State v. Raymond

245 So. 2d 335 (1971)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Raymond

Louisiana Supreme Court
245 So. 2d 335 (1971)

Facts

The State of Louisiana (plaintiff) charged James Raymond (defendant) with murder based on the death of James Quinn. At Raymond’s trial, the state called John Luther Jackson as a witness. Jackson testified that just hours before Raymond allegedly killed Quinn, Quinn and Jackson had a conversation in which Quinn called Raymond a punk and said that Raymond wanted to have sex with Quinn that night. Jackson further testified that immediately after Quinn made that statement, Quinn hid behind a tree to avoid being seen by Raymond. Raymond objected, arguing that Quinn’s statement was inadmissible hearsay and that the statement connected Raymond with the separate crime of sodomy. The trial court admitted Quinn’s statement as evidence of Quinn’s state of mind and instructed the jury that the statement should not be considered as evidence of the truth of the statement’s contents. The jury ultimately found Raymond guilty of manslaughter, and he appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sanders, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership