From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...
State v. Reldan
Superior Court of New Jersey
167 N.J.Super. 595, 401 A.2d 563 (1979)
Reldan (defendant) was charged with two murders on one indictment. Two women from the same area of New Jersey were reported missing in the beginning of October 1975. At the end of the month, both women’s bodies were found in remote areas of New York not far from each other. Both women were found nude and both had been strangled with a pair of pantyhose. The women had the same neck injury which is rare in strangulation cases. The women were about the same age, weight, and height. Reldan seeks separate trials for each count on the indictment. He claims that joinder is prejudicial.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (J. Madden)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 517,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 517,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.