Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
From our private database of 18,800+ case briefs...

State v. Rider

Supreme Court of Missouri
1 S.W. 825 (1886)


Rider (defendant) intended to kill R.P. Tallent whom Rider suspected of having an affair with his wife. Armed with a shot gun, Rider walked to Tallent’s house in search of his wife. Near the house, Tallent approached Rider with an axe, intending to strike him. After Rider told Tallent to stop, Rider shot and killed him. Rider was charged with first-degree murder. At trial, the court instructed the jury that Rider was guilty if they believed that Rider went to Tallent’s home with the intention of killing him and that he armed himself with a gun and thereafter went in search of Tallent and did, in fact, shoot and kill Tallent. Rider was convicted and he appealed.

Rule of Law


Holding and Reasoning (Henry, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 498,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 498,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 18,800 briefs, keyed to 985 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial