Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

State v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Kansas
934 P.2d 38 (1997)


Facts

Clyde Crowley claimed his sons were being threatened by a group of boys led by Jeremy Hendrickson. Crowley believed the police were not adequately responding to the threats and chose to confront Hendrickson and his followers, including Jerry Lee Robinson (defendant), at a local park. Crowley told the boys to leave his sons alone. An altercation ensued, and one of the boys threatened Crowley with a knife. Crowley retrieved a baseball bat and started chasing the boys. The boys armed themselves with golf clubs, and Crowley and the boys started fencing with the bat and clubs. One of the boys hit Crowley in the back with a golf club, and Crowley chased him. After the boy fell to the ground, Crowley hit the boy twice with the bat. Hendrickson then hit Crowley twice in the back and ribs with a golf club. As the boy on the ground began to get up, Robinson struck Crowley in the head with a golf club. The club became lodged in Crowley’s head, and the boys fled the scene. Crowley died from the strike to his head. Robinson, who was 14 years old, returned to the crime scene and told officers his version of events. Robinson was convicted of depraved heart second-degree murder under Kansas Statutes Annotated § 21-3402(b). At trial, the jury was instructed on depraved-heart murder and the lesser-included offense of involuntary manslaughter. The court of appeals affirmed Robinson’s conviction. Robinson appealed to the Supreme Court of Kansas, arguing that depraved-heart murder and involuntary manslaughter are essentially the same offense with two different penalty levels, resulting in arbitrary distinctions in enforcement.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Abbott, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Concurrence/Dissent (Lockett, J.)

The concurrence/dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the judge’s concurrence in part and dissent in part.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 217,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.