State v. Salamon

949 A.2d 1092 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Salamon

Connecticut Supreme Court
949 A.2d 1092 (2008)

Facts

A 15-year-old girl got on the wrong train leaving from New York City at night. Rather than arriving at her intended stop in New York State, she awoke on the train to find that she was arriving in Connecticut. When she got off the train, she saw Scott Salamon (defendant) watching her. Salamon followed the girl into a stairwell and grabbed her by the back of the neck, knocking her down onto the steps. The girl screamed and fought back against Salamon. Salamon punched the girl once in the face and attempted to shove his fingers down her throat. Salamon restrained her on the stairs for at least five minutes before she was able to free herself and flee to safety. Salamon was arrested shortly after the attack. Salamon was convicted of risk of injury to a child, first-degree unlawful restraint based on the assault, and second-degree kidnapping. Salamon appealed, alleging that the jury should have been instructed that he could not be convicted on the kidnapping charge if his restraint of the victim was merely incidental to the crime of assault.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Palmer, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership