State v. Scarlett

395 A.2d 1244 (1978)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Scarlett

New Hampshire Supreme Court
395 A.2d 1244 (1978)

SC

Facts

The State of New Hampshire (plaintiff) charged Michael Scarlett (defendant) with sexual abuse of a minor. The prosecution claimed that the abuse occurred on Scarlett’s bed. Scarlett contended that he was not the person who committed the abuse. At trial, the prosecution called a police officer to testify about a picture of an apparently blood-stained bedspread taken from Scarlett’s bed. In doing so, the prosecution showed the picture to the jury. The prosecution had not called a chemist or other expert witness to testify that the stains on the bedspread were in fact blood. Accordingly, the defense objected to the prosecution’s displaying of the picture. The trial judge overruled the objection, likely expecting the prosecution to call an expert witness at some point thereafter to lay a foundation for the picture. However, the prosecution did not call an expert to testify as to what was on the bedspread. Given this failure, the defense moved for a mistrial. The trial judge denied the motion but struck the testimony regarding the bedspread and instructed the jury to disregard having ever seen the picture. The jury convicted Scarlett, and he appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bois, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership