State v. Schminkey
Iowa Supreme Court
597 N.W.2d 785 (1999)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
William Schminkey (defendant) consumed numerous alcoholic beverages at a party and at a bar before leaving the bar in a pickup truck belonging to Dale Kimm. Schminkey did not have Kimm’s permission to drive the vehicle, and witnesses attested to Schminkey’s erratic operation of the pickup. While driving through a small town, Schminkey ran a stop sign and collided with two vehicles, killing one of the other drivers. Although Schminkey did not stop at the scene of the accident, he collided with a fence shortly afterward and was arrested with a blood-alcohol level well above Iowa’s legal limit. Schminkey was charged with three offenses under Iowa law: (1) homicide by vehicle, (2) involuntary manslaughter, and (3) theft. Schminkey claimed that, due to his intoxication, he had no recollection of the evening’s events, and therefore entered a plea agreement under which Schminkey offered Alford pleas to the homicide and theft offenses in exchange for dismissal of the manslaughter charge. Schminkey was sentenced to consecutive 10-year and five-year terms of imprisonment. Schminkey appealed and claimed that the record lacked sufficient support for a guilty finding on the theft offense, as there was no evidence Schminkey intended to permanently deprive Kimm of the pickup.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ternus, J.)
Dissent (Carter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.