State v. Shock
Supreme Court of Missouri
68 Mo. 552 (1878)
At the time of this case, the Missouri felony murder statute provided that a homicide constituted first degree murder when committed during the course of certain named felonies or any “other felony.” Shock (defendant) beat a young boy with a fishing pole and a grapevine for about fifteen minutes, covering the boy’s head with bruises, beating his back severely, and fracturing his skull. After the boy died from the beating, Shock was charged with first degree murder. At Sharp’s trial in the circuit court, the court instructed the jury that, even if Shock did not intend to kill the boy, he was guilty of first degree murder if he intended to inflict great bodily harm. Shock was convicted of first degree murder and appealed to the Supreme Court of Missouri.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hough, J.)
Concurrence (Henry, J.)
Dissent (Norton, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.