State v. Smith
Kansas Court of Appeals
39 Kan. App. 2d 204, 178 P.3d 672 (2008)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
One evening, Jesse Smith (defendant) went out for dinner and drinks with his female friend, S.L. S.L. thought of Smith only as a friend. S.L. was dating another man, and she was not interested in a sexual relationship with Smith. After consuming a large quantity of beer, S.L. passed out in Smith’s car on the way to Smith’s home. Smith told S.L. it was unsafe for her to drive and suggested that S.L. sleep in his bed, while he slept on the sofa. S.L. invited Smith to sleep on the other side of the bed, but without any intent to have sexual relations. When S.L. awoke, she discovered that she was naked from the waist down and had semen in her genital area. S.L. left Smith’s house without confronting him. Smith was convicted of rape under Kansas Statutes Annotated § 21-3502(a)(1)(C). Smith testified that he did not remember anything between falling asleep on the couch and waking up the next morning. At trial, L.S. testified as a witness that Smith had committed similar conduct with her. Smith appealed the conviction on the grounds, among others, that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction, and (2) the trial court erred by failing to give an instruction on the defense of voluntary intoxication.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Greene, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.