State v. Stewart

420 N.W.2d 44 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Stewart

Wisconsin Supreme Court
420 N.W.2d 44 (1988)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Scott Kodanko was alone in a three-sided bus shelter when Walter Stewart (defendant) and Mr. Moore entered and stood blocking the exit, while a third man, Mr. Levy, waited outside. Moore said, “Give us some change.” When Kodanko refused, Stewart said, “Give us some change, man,” several times in an increasingly loud voice. Stewart reached into his coat pocket, and Moore said something like “put that gun away.” Levy entered the shelter, said, “Come on, let’s go,” and showed Kodanko some money, saying, “I don’t want your money, I got lots of money.” The three men then left. Moore returned and made small talk with Kodanko, but somebody called the police, who arrested the three men shortly afterward. Kodanko testified he felt threatened throughout the incident, which lasted under three minutes. The men never touched or raised a hand to Kodanko, who did not try to leave the shelter. Stewart was nonetheless convicted of attempted robbery. Stewart appealed, arguing he never intended to rob Kodanko and was only panhandling. The appellate court reversed Stewart’s conviction, and the prosecution (plaintiff) appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Abrahamson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership