State v. Striggles

210 N.W. 137 (1926)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Striggles

Iowa Supreme Court
210 N.W. 137 (1926)

Facts

Iowa law prohibited willfully having a commercial establishment that allowed gambling. A municipal court evaluated a particular gum- or mint-vending machine and ruled that the machine was not a gambling device. The machine’s distributors asked D. T. Striggles (defendant) to allow them to place one of the vending machines in his restaurant and showed him the municipal court’s ruling as proof that the machine was legal. Relying on the court ruling, Striggles allowed the machine to be installed and used in his restaurant. Later, the Iowa Supreme Court determined that the machine was a gambling device, and Striggles was criminally charged with having willfully allowed gambling on the machine in his restaurant. At trial, the court did not allow Striggles to introduce evidence of the municipal court order stating that the machine was legal. Striggles was convicted and fined. On appeal, the Iowa Supreme Court evaluated whether Striggles should have been allowed to introduce evidence of the municipal court’s order either to (1) establish a mistake-of-law defense or (2) show that he lacked any intent to commit an illegal act.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Albert, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership