State v. Stubbs

562 N.W.2d 547 (1997)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Stubbs

Nebraska Supreme Court
562 N.W.2d 547 (1997)

Facts

In March 1993, Colorado resident Janie Knickerbocker visited her elderly uncle Dale Edmisten in Nebraska. Knickerbocker observed that Edmisten could recall the past clearly but had some difficulty understanding the present. He also had some trouble moving. Knickerbocker obtained a power of attorney to manage Edmisten’s health and affairs. She believed Edmisten should no longer be living alone but decided to delay moving him to a nursing home until May. She returned home to Colorado in the meantime, and Edmisten continued to live alone, cooking his own meals, dressing himself, bathing himself, and paying his bills. That spring, Rick Stubbs (defendant) visited Edmisten multiple times to purchase various items. After Stubbs left, Edmisten would notice that other items were missing from his home. When Knickerbocker returned to Edmisten’s home in May, she too noticed that various items present in March were now missing, including an Indian war ax, a set of antique dressers, a rifle, and a tractor. She filed a complaint with the local sheriff’s department, and the investigation resulted in Stubbs being charged with knowing and intentional abuse of a vulnerable adult by exploitation. At Stubbs’s trial, one of the contested issues was whether Edmisten qualified as a vulnerable adult. Several of Edmisten’s neighbors testified that he had some mobility issues and sometimes had trouble remembering things. A doctor who assessed Edmisten testified that he was mildly senile and had some balance issues but was otherwise normal and active for his age, if lacking full awareness of the consequences of his actions. The doctor testified that Edmisten should likely be considered a vulnerable adult. The jury agreed, finding that Edmisten suffered from a substantial functional impairment and was therefore a vulnerable adult. It convicted Stubbs. The state appeals court reversed, finding that Edmisten did not suffer from a substantial functional impairment and Stubbs’s conviction was therefore improper. The state appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (White, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 905,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 995 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 905,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 995 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership