State v. T.R.D.
Connecticut Supreme Court
286 Conn. 191, 942 A.2d 1000 (2008)
In 1998, T.R.D. (defendant) was convicted of sexual assault and risk of injury to a child, and was sentenced to 12 years in prison with probation available after five years. Prior to T.R.D.’s release to probation in November 2002, a correction officer met with T.R.D. to explain that T.R.D. must register with Connecticut’s sex-offender registry. The registry required T.R.D. to report in person at specified intervals and routinely return address-verification letters mailed to the registrant’s address of record every 90 days. If a registrant did not respond to an address-verification letter, two more were sent within the same 90-day period. T.R.D. signed two documents attesting to his understanding of these requirements and the potential criminal consequences for noncompliance. In February 2003, T.R.D. failed to return the first letter, but responded to the second letter and verified that his address remained the same. In May 2003, during the second 90-day interval after T.R.D.’s release, T.R.D. failed to respond to any of the three letters, and his status was considered unknown. In February 2004, T.R.D. was arrested. A jury found T.R.D. guilty of violating General Statutes § 54-251 and § 54-257, which criminalize failure to register as a sex offender and failure to comply with the address-verification requirements of the registry. T.R.D. appealed on the ground that the trial court erred by not instructing the jury as to a mens rea requirement for the offenses.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Vertefeuille, J.)
Dissent (Schaller, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.