State v. Taft
Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia
102 S.E.2d 152 (1958)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Taft (defendant) was sitting in his parked car waiting for another person when the car’s brakes accidentally released and the car drifted about three feet into the rear end of another car. Taft was charged with driving under the influence. At trial, the foreman requested the trial court to answer “[I]s there a legal definition for what constitutes driving a car?” The trial court, over Taft’s objection, responded that the term “driving” was defined as requiring that a vehicle be in motion in order for the offense to be committed. Taft was convicted and he appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Given, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.