State v. Tate
New Jersey Supreme Court
505 A.2d 941 (1986)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Before New Jersey legalized marijuana, Michael Tate (defendant) used it to relieve severe, completely disabling spasticity resulting from his quadriplegia. He was charged with possessing more than 25 grams of the drug and intended to raise a necessity defense. The prosecution (plaintiff) moved to strike his necessity defense as unavailable under New Jersey law. The trial judge refused, reasoning Tate could raise the defense because of his circumstances, and the appellate court affirmed with one judge dissenting. The prosecution appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clifford, J.)
Dissent (Handler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.