State v. Terry
Louisiana Court of Appeal
654 So. 2d 455 (1995)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
William Terry III (defendant) was charged with aggravated rape and attempted murder based on an August 1992 altercation between Terry and his ex-girlfriend. At trial, Terry’s ex-girlfriend testified that she and Terry began dating in January of 1992 but broke up in August because Terry abused her. On cross-examination, Terry’s ex-girlfriend admitted to cutting Terry during previous physical altercations in 1992, but the trial court did not permit Terry’s counsel to ask the ex-girlfriend whether she had ever attacked other family members. The state (plaintiff) also presented testimony from Mathis Holiday, who lived in the area and knew Terry’s ex-girlfriend. However, the court did not allow the defense to question Holiday about the ex-girlfriend’s reputation for truthfulness in the community because Holiday had spoken to only three or four unidentified people who said that the ex-girlfriend was a liar, and Holiday did not provide details about these discussions. During the defense’s case, Terry testified that his ex-girlfriend was violent and had attacked him, and that he was merely defending himself against her. Terry did not testify during direct examination about whether he knew of alleged violence by the ex-girlfriend against anyone other than Terry. Consequently, the court did not allow Terry and other witnesses to answer questions about whether they had knowledge of any violence by the ex-girlfriend against other people. The jury found Terry guilty of attempted murder, and he appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Whipple, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.