State v. Thompson

563 S.E.2d 325 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Thompson

South Carolina Supreme Court
563 S.E.2d 325 (2002)

Facts

South Carolina (plaintiff) statutes established a two-month trapping season. The state allowed the trapping of destructive animals out of season with a special depredation permit (i.e., a permit for hunting or trapping destructive animals), which was easily obtainable at no cost. Property owners or their designees could also trap destructive animals within 100 yards of the owner’s residence without a permit. Jeffrey Thompson (defendant) placed beaver traps on his mother’s property outside of trapping season. Thompson’s depredation permit had expired, and he was found guilty of trapping beaver out of season. Thompson appealed his conviction, arguing that the statutes were unconstitutional because they infringed on his fundamental right to protect private property. Thompson also claimed the statutes violated the equal-protection clauses of the United States and South Carolina constitutions because they treated some property owners unequally (e.g., an owner with a residence could trap animals within 100 yards of that residence without a permit, whereas an owner with no structures or nonresidential structures had to obtain a permit). The circuit court affirmed Thompson’s conviction, and Thompson appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Waller, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership