State v. Thompson
Louisiana Court of Appeal
578 So. 2d 1151 (1991)

- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
Arthur Thompson (defendant) climbed through a window and entered a church, where he found a cigar box containing $550 in cash. Thompson attempted to flee with the cash in hand until he encountered Father William O’Brien. The Father confronted Thompson, and a struggle ensued. Thompson threw O’Brien against the wall and beat him with his fist. O’Brien fell to the floor, and Thompson struck him twice more with his fists before fleeing through the back door. O’Brien bled to death as a result of severe lacerations to his face. Thompson was subsequently stopped and arrested for traffic violations, and, once authorities learned of O’Brien’s murder, became an immediate suspect. Thompson confessed to the murder. At trial, the main contention between the state and the defense was whether or not O’Brien’s injuries were inflicted with Thompson’s fists or with an iron rod that had been seized from Thompson’s truck. Thompson testified that he did not enter the church with the iron rod or use it against O’Brien and further testified that he did not intend to kill O’Brien. Instead, Thompson explained that he threw O’Brien against the wall and struck him in order to free himself from O’Brien’s grasp and escape. In his confession, Thompson stated that O’Brien was still breathing when he fled. Thompson was convicted of first-degree murder and appealed on grounds that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lanier, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.