State v. Thornton
Tennessee Supreme Court
730 S.W.2d 309 (1987)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
James (defendant) and Lavinia Thornton were married but had been separated for approximately six weeks. No divorce action had been filed. During the separation, James rented an apartment while Lavinia stayed in the couple’s house with their young son. James had been making a serious effort toward reconciliation with Lavinia. One night, James drove to the house, stating that he wanted to try one more time to convince his wife that his attempts at reconciliation were sincere. James noticed an unfamiliar car parked in the driveway and observed Lavinia drinking with and kissing Mark McConkey, whom James had never met. James, unnoticed by Lavinia or McConkey, decided to go to his apartment to retrieve his camera. He testified that he intended to take pictures for the purpose of showing them to his marriage counselor and possibly to use as evidence in potential divorce proceedings. When James returned to the house, he listened outside the bedroom window and heard the sounds of sexual intercourse. James burst into the house, where he found Lavinia and McConkey in bed naked. James attempted to take pictures of the two. James testified that at this point, he thought McConkey was attempting to attack him. James drew his pistol and threatened to shoot McConkey. James then fired a single shot, striking McConkey in the hip. McConkey later died from the bullet wound. James testified that he did not intend to kill McConkey; he simply wanted to prevent an attack from McConkey. James also testified that he lost control due to his outrage at the situation. A jury convicted James of first-degree murder. James appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Harbison, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Drowota, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.