State v. Thornton
Washington Supreme Court
835 P.2d 216 (1992)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
Robert Thornton (defendant) and Arlene Thornton were a married couple. In July 1990, Arlene obtained a no-contact order against Robert. Thereafter, while Arlene was at work, Robert allegedly entered her home without permission by breaking a window, damaged her personal property, and stole Arlene’s suitcase. A neighbor saw Robert in the home and called the police. Robert fled the scene. The state (plaintiff) charged Robert with residential burglary, and Robert moved to exclude Arlene’s testimony based on a rule of spousal incompetency. The rule precluded a wife from testifying against her husband without his consent unless she had been the victim of personal violence. The trial court granted Robert’s motion and dismissed the charge against him without prejudice. The state appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Durham, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.