State v. Tuttle

730 P.2d 630 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Tuttle

Utah Supreme Court
730 P.2d 630 (1986)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Wesley Tuttle (defendant) claimed he escaped from prison under duress. Tuttle and inmate Eugene Brady were assigned repair work in a visiting room. Brady said someone told him other inmates were going to kill them if they returned to the main corridor. Already outside several security checkpoints and dressed in maintenance uniforms, the inmates simply walked out unnoticed. Authorities found Tuttle five months later and charged him with escaping from custody. Tuttle claimed the death threat forced him to escape and requested a jury instruction reciting the general Utah duress-defense statute. The trial judge read the general instruction but added three additional conditions: duress would excuse Tuttle’s escape only if he (1) faced a specific threat of death or substantial bodily injury, (2) either had no time to complain to the authorities or could show a history of futile complaints, and (3) reported to the authorities immediately afterward. The jury convicted. Tuttle appealed, arguing the judge had improperly narrowed the duress defense.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Zimmerman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership