State v. Urbina
New Jersey Supreme Court
115 A.3d 261 (2015)
- Written by Paul Neel, JD
Facts
Edwin Urbana (defendant) was charged with first-degree murder for shooting and killing Edwin Torres. Urbana was 16 years old at the time of the shooting. Urbana faced a potential life sentence. The state (plaintiff) offered to reduce the charges to first-degree aggravated manslaughter, with a recommended sentence not to exceed 17.5 years, in exchange for Urbana’s guilty plea. During the plea colloquy, defense counsel questioned Urbana about the shooting. Urbana alleged that he and Torres had argued and that Torres had smacked him. Urbana also alleged that as he turned to walk away from Torres, he saw Torres draw a firearm, and in response, Urbana drew his own automatic handgun, pulled the trigger, and the gun discharged six rounds, killing Torres. The trial court asked Urbana whether he pointed the gun at Torres when he fired. Urbana said he had. Defense counsel added that the police found no gun on Torres and that defense counsel and Urbana had resolved that self-defense was not a viable defense. The prosecutor also added that an eyewitness stated that Torres was unarmed. The trial judge asked whether Urbana agreed. Urbana said that he agreed. The prosecutor requested that a waiver of a self-defense claim be added to the plea agreement. Urbana signed the amended agreement. Urbana was convicted of first-degree aggravated manslaughter and appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fernandez-Vina, J.)
Dissent (Solomon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.