State v. Warshow
Vermont Supreme Court
410 A.2d 1000 (1979)
Warshow (defendant) was one of a group of demonstrators who were trying to prevent the reopening of a nuclear power plant that had been temporarily closed for repairs and refueling. Warshow and a number of other demonstrators were arrested and charged with unlawful trespass after they refused to leave the private property surrounding the plant. The trial court refused Warshow’s request to present a defense of necessity supported by evidence of the hazards of low-level radiation, nuclear waste buildup, and nuclear accident created by the operation of the power plant. The court also refused Warshow’s request for a jury instruction on the defense of necessity. Warshow was convicted and appealed to the Supreme Court of Vermont.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Barney, C.J.)
Concurrence (Hill, J.)
Dissent (Billings, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 708,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 708,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.