State v. Washington
Louisiana Court of Appeal
626 So. 2d 841 (1993)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Elvis Washington (defendant) was charged with the distribution of cocaine. On the morning the trial was scheduled to start, the jury venire was in the courtroom with the district attorney, the court clerk, the court reporter, and the sheriff, and then joined by the assistant district attorney who would be trying the case. Washington, his counsel, and the trial judge were not present. Addressing the jurors, the clerk stated that “we appreciate your coming to jury service” (emphasis added throughout), that summoning a group of prospective jurors often pressured individuals to plead guilty to the charges or to lesser offenses, and that if that occurred, “we send you home without having to serve.” The clerk introduced the district attorney, who stated, “we’re glad to have you, and we do appreciate you,” the prospective jurors were “the backbone of our system,” he hoped it was “not too much of an inconvenience,” and any prospective juror who had genuine hardships should speak to the judge and “we appreciate it.” These remarks were transcribed by the court reporter. Washington’s counsel moved for a mistrial after jury selection, arguing that the district attorney’s ex parte communications with the prospective jurors improperly sought to gain favor with the venire and that the clerk’s comments improperly implied that all or many defendants are guilty. The trial court denied the motion. Washington was convicted after trial and appealed his conviction and sentence.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Marvin, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.