Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

State v. Weddell

Supreme Court of Nevada
27 P.3d 450 (2001)


Facts

On October 6, 1997, a Chevrolet truck drove onto the property of a business owned by Rolland Weddell (defendant). One of Weddell’s employees approached the truck, which accelerated toward and hit the employee. A passenger in the truck, James Bustamonte, threatened the employee and asked for Weddell’s daughter. The next day, Weddell heard that Bustamonte was looking for Weddell’s daughter to speak about a drug deal. Weddell gave Bustamonte’s address to the police department, but when the police did not act on the information, Weddell went to Bustamonte’s home himself. Weddell saw the same Chevrolet truck from the previous day parked in the driveway and called the police. Fifteen minutes later, when Bustamonte exited the house, the police still had not arrived. Weddell parked his car behind the Chevrolet truck to prevent Bustamonte from leaving and pointed a gun at Bustamonte, attempting to make a citizen’s arrest by demanding that Bustamonte place his hands on the hood. Instead, Bustamonte attempted to run, and Weddell shot at Bustamonte a number of times. Weddell was later charged with assault with a deadly weapon and discharging a firearm at another person. Previously, § 200.160(3) of the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) codified the fleeing-felon rule under common law, which allowed a private person to use deadly force to detain a felon. However, the state legislature later repealed NRS § 200.160(3) and enacted NRS § 171.1455, which limited the use of deadly force by police officers when making a felony arrest. The district court determined that Weddell’s use of deadly force to effect Bustamonte’s arrest was permissible under Nevada law and dismissed the charges. The state appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Agosti, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.