State v. Wentz

149 Wash.2d 342, 68 P.3d 282 (2003)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Wentz

Washington Supreme Court
149 Wash.2d 342, 68 P.3d 282 (2003)

RW

Facts

Gerald Lee Wentz (defendant) climbed over a man's backyard fence, intending to attack the man when he returned home. Police arrested Wentz and the State of Washington (plaintiff) prosecuted him for burglary, which was statutorily defined as entry with criminal intent into another person's building. "Building" meant "any dwelling, fenced area, vehicle, railway car, cargo container, or any other structure used for lodging or for carrying on business therein, or for the use, sale or deposit of goods." The state's trial evidence did not establish the purpose for which the backyard had been fenced. The jury convicted Wentz, and an appellate court affirmed the conviction. Wentz appealed to the Washington Supreme Court. Wentz based his appeal on a 1967 case that arose under an earlier burglary statute. The earlier statute made no mention of fenced areas, and the court held in 1967 that the state must prove that a fenced area's main purpose was analogous to the purpose of structures to which the burglary statute specifically applied.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ireland, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 736,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 736,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership