State v. Whittey

149 N.H. 463, 821 A.2d 1086 (2003)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Whittey

New Hampshire Supreme Court
149 N.H. 463, 821 A.2d 1086 (2003)

Facts

Joseph Whittey (defendant) was charged with first-degree murder in the course of rape. A semen sample on the victim’s clothes was sent to a lab for DNA analysis. A DNA sample from Whittey was also sent to the lab. In testing DNA, the lab used a procedure called polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based short tandem repeat (STR) DNA testing. PCR-based STR DNA testing involved comparing the pattern of repeated chemicals in a known DNA sample with the pattern of repeated chemicals in an unknown DNA sample. The result of the PCR-based STR DNA testing indicated that the DNA in the semen sample on the victim’s clothes matched Whittey’s DNA profile. The trial-court judge held an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the result of the PCR-based STR DNA testing was admissible. There was evidence of numerous articles in scientific journals that acknowledged the widespread acceptance of PCR-based STR DNA testing. Further, Dr. Robin Cotton, a forensic scientist, testified that PCR-based STR DNA testing was generally accepted in the scientific community. The trial-court judge admitted the result of the PCR-based STR DNA testing. Subsequently, the jury convicted Whittey. Whittey appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Dalianis, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership