State v. Whittey
New Hampshire Supreme Court
149 N.H. 463, 821 A.2d 1086 (2003)
- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
Joseph Whittey (defendant) was charged with first-degree murder in the course of rape. A semen sample on the victim’s clothes was sent to a lab for DNA analysis. A DNA sample from Whittey was also sent to the lab. In testing DNA, the lab used a procedure called polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based short tandem repeat (STR) DNA testing. PCR-based STR DNA testing involved comparing the pattern of repeated chemicals in a known DNA sample with the pattern of repeated chemicals in an unknown DNA sample. The result of the PCR-based STR DNA testing indicated that the DNA in the semen sample on the victim’s clothes matched Whittey’s DNA profile. The trial-court judge held an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the result of the PCR-based STR DNA testing was admissible. There was evidence of numerous articles in scientific journals that acknowledged the widespread acceptance of PCR-based STR DNA testing. Further, Dr. Robin Cotton, a forensic scientist, testified that PCR-based STR DNA testing was generally accepted in the scientific community. The trial-court judge admitted the result of the PCR-based STR DNA testing. Subsequently, the jury convicted Whittey. Whittey appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dalianis, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
