State v. Wilbur-Bobb

141 P.3d 665 (2006)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Wilbur-Bobb

Washington Court of Appeals
141 P.3d 665 (2006)

SC

Facts

Sandra Wilbur-Bobb (defendant) had been out drinking with friends prior to driving her car off the road and flipping it. One of the passengers in the car died in the accident. The accident occurred at approximately 5:30 a.m. Wilbur-Bobb’s blood-alcohol level was tested at 9:41 a.m. and showed a blood-alcohol content of 0.05, below the legal limit of 0.08. The prosecution (plaintiff) charged Wilbur-Bobb with vehicular homicide. The key issue at trial was whether Wilbur-Bobb was intoxicated at the time of the accident. The prosecution introduced Wilbur-Bobb’s blood-alcohol test and the expert testimony of Estuardo Miranda. Miranda used the theory of retrograde extrapolation to estimate that Wilbur-Bobb’s blood-alcohol content had been between 0.092 and 0.156—above the legal limit—at the time of the accident. Wilbur-Bobb objected to the foundation for the testimony, focusing on Miranda’s qualifications as an expert witness. The court overruled the objection. Wilbur-Bobb was convicted, and she appealed. On appeal, Wilbur-Bobb argued that retrograde extrapolation was not generally accepted in the scientific community as required by the Frye test.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Becker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership