State v. Willett
West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals
674 S.E.2d 602 (2009)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Gloria Willett (defendant) was charged with possessing drugs with the intent to sell them. At trial, a witness testified that Willett had sold him drugs on previous occasions. Willett’s brother had also given a police statement that supported the witness’s testimony. Willett was convicted and moved for a new trial. The trial court denied the new-trial motion. Willett appealed the denial, arguing that the prior-drug-sale evidence was inadmissible character evidence that might have caused the jury to convict her on an improper basis. Willett contended that she deserved a new trial on the current charges only, free from evidence of the prior drug-sale crimes.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
Concurrence (Ketchum, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.