State v. Witham
Maine Supreme Judicial Court
876 A.2d 40 (2005)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
John Witham (defendant) lived with his girlfriend, Augusta, who owned a cat. Witham did not like the cat and frequently would fight with Augusta about the cat living with them. One day, Witham was sitting in his truck with the cat in a carrier in the car with him. Augusta came outside and the two began arguing over the cat. Witham said “last chance, either me or your cat,” before dropping the cat carrier. Witham then maneuvered the car to run over the carrier and killed the cat. A witness testified that he observed Witham laughing after running over the animal. The State of Maine (the State) (plaintiff) charged Witham with aggravated cruelty to animals. The jury convicted Witham of the charge. On appeal, Witham argued that the cruelty-to-animals statute he was convicted under was void due to its unconstitutional vagueness. Particularly, Witham asserted that the statute’s reference to depraved indifference to animal life or suffering is not defined by the legislature and thus vague.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Levy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.