State v. Woods

619 So. 2d 803 (1993)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Woods

Louisiana Court of Appeal
619 So. 2d 803 (1993)

Facts

Milton Brown and his girlfriend, Gwendolyn Stewart, drove to a house. Brown went in the house, and Stewart stayed in the car. A few minutes later, Brown exited the house and crossed the street. Stewart then saw Leroy Woods (defendant) cross the street in the same direction as Brown. Stewart heard Brown begging someone not to shoot him, followed by gunshots. Stewart told police that she saw Woods holding a gun immediately after the shooting. Brown also told police that Woods was the shooter. Brown ultimately died from his gunshot wounds, and the State of Louisiana (plaintiff) charged Woods with murder. At Woods’s trial, Stewart testified that she did not see Woods after the shooting. The prosecutor referred Stewart to her previous statement to the police and again asked Stewart when she saw Woods. Stewart testified both that she had not seen Woods and that she could not remember whether she saw Woods. The prosecutor asked Stewart if it would help to hear her previous taped statement to the police, and Stewart said yes. The trial court allowed the prosecution to play the tape for Stewart and the jury. Stewart testified that the statement was truthful and made while the shooting was fresh in her mind. Stewart further testified that her statement was how she remembered the facts of the shooting. After hearing the statement, Stewart testified that she saw Woods holding a gun after the shooting. Stewart also identified Woods in court as the shooter and identified clothing that Woods wore on the night of the shooting. The jury convicted Woods of manslaughter, and he appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gonzales, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership