South Carolina Supreme Court
310 S.E.2d 805 (1982)
Yates (defendant) and two accomplices drove around looking for places to rob. One of the accomplices was left at a shopping mall while Yates and the other accomplice, armed with a handgun and a knife, went to rob a general store. Yates shot the owner of the store, wounding him, but not fatally. The accomplice stabbed the owner’s wife to death and was killed during the robbery by the store owner. Yates was charged with and convicted of murder, armed robbery, assault and battery with intent to kill, and conspiracy. He was sentenced to death. Yates appealed his death sentence, claiming that, while he was criminally responsible for the death of the store owner’s wife, his accomplice committed the murder. Yates claimed that the death penalty should not apply to individuals who did not kill anyone personally.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.