United States Supreme Court
451 U.S. 204 (1981)
Law enforcement obtained an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons. The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) received a confidential tip that Lyons would be at a particular address, which was the home of Gary Steagald (defendant). When DEA agents arrived at the address, they encountered two men, including Steagald, outside. Upon determining that neither man was Lyons, the agents went into Steagald’s home to search for Lyons. During their search, the agents found what they believed to be cocaine. Later, they obtained a search warrant and found 43 pounds of cocaine in the home. Steagald was convicted of drug crimes related to the cocaine. Steagald appealed, arguing that the initial search of his home was warrantless and unreasonable. The court of appeals affirmed the conviction. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Marshall, J.)
Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.