Stebbins v. University of Arkansas
United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Civil No.10-5125, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 182620 (2012)

- Written by Miller Jozwiak, JD
Facts
David Stebbins (plaintiff) was a student at the University of Arkansas (university) (defendant). Stebbins lived with Asperger’s syndrome and requested an accommodation to help negotiate what he called his tactlessness with professors. During the fall of 2007, Stebbins had several difficult interactions with university staff. For example, Stebbins often became enraged over what others perceived as minor incidents. When the university’s health center had to reschedule Stebbins’s appointment to renew his prescriptions because Stebbins was late to the appointment, Stebbins said that if he did not get his medications refilled, there could be another Virginia Tech incident, referring to a mass shooting that had occurred at another university, killing a large number of people, only months earlier. According to a university official, this was not an isolated comment. In December 2007, the university banned Stebbins from its campus. Several years later, Stebbins sought to re-enroll at the university. During that process, Stebbins sent a profane and malicious email to the university’s chancellor, although the only express threat in the email was to sue the university. The university denied Stebbins’s request to re-enroll. Stebbins sued the university for violating § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act by failing to accommodate his disability. The parties completed a bench trial in the district court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hendren, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.