Steffel v. Thompson
United States Supreme Court
415 U.S. 452 (1974)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Richard Steffel (plaintiff) was among a group distributing antiwar handbills outside a Georgia shopping center (defendant). The police warned that continued distribution would result in arrest for criminal trespass, and the group left. Two days later, Steffel and Sandra Becker (plaintiff) went to the same shopping center to distribute handbills, prompting the police to issue the same warning. Steffel left, but Becker persisted, was arrested, and faced prosecution in state court. Steffel and Becker sued the shopping center’s owner and various Georgia officials in federal court, seeking (1) a declaratory judgment that Georgia’s criminal-trespass statute was being applied in a manner that violated the First Amendment and (2) an injunction preventing the statute’s enforcement. In the lawsuit, the parties stipulated that Steffel would be arrested if he tried to distribute handbills at the shopping center again. The district court declined to issue any relief and dismissed the lawsuit. Only Steffel appealed, specifically contesting only the denial of his request for a declaratory judgment. The Fifth Circuit affirmed, finding federal declaratory relief was appropriate only if the state’s threat to prosecute Steffel created an irreparable injury, such as if the prosecution threat was a type of bad-faith harassment, and there was no evidence of any irreparable injury. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
Concurrence (Rehnquist, J.)
Concurrence (Stewart, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.